If we define a god as a really powerful "being", "being" here meaning particular "object", "person", "idea", anything that exists, in any form, and with a broad definition of "Power" then there are certainly gods? No?
The Sun
Vladimir Putin
Communism
Capitalism (Which seems to be the “god of our age”)
These are all “gods” in various senses of the word, and I doubt the ancients understood it to be much different than that.
Even if you bring up the term "Divine" to denote them, you still have to define the term. The only definition I find tenable is "something worshipped" (Unless you believe divinity is a sort of “property”, which in that case I find that just plain ridiculous for obvious reasons), but then what is "worship" besides the way gods and their subjects relate? In that sense, we "worship" a lot of things, and people. The way many self-appointed guardians and evangelists of the “sacred” physical sciences do their “crusade” against “religion” (Which is actually atheistic naturalism masquerading as science) isn’t much different from the behaviours of “fanatical” heralds of other “religions”. Their search for truth, as misguided as I think they are, is as much a “religious” search as my search for truth through the various fields of the physical sciences, philosophy, theology, and so on. There are many gods, many “powers” (In St. Paul’s words), and even if the ancients “personalized” them, that doesn’t invalidate the truth of their influence (I happen to think they were right in their “personalizations” anyway, but that’s another topic for another day).